tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post7287176614118497252..comments2024-03-29T00:02:14.892-07:00Comments on ListenData: SAS BASE CERTIFICATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS - PART 3 OF 4Deepanshu Bhallahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09802839558125192674noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-4932900150544643642019-09-28T18:08:18.913-07:002019-09-28T18:08:18.913-07:00It's there to confuse peopleIt's there to confuse people<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14958349429658703421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-78924951590582497262018-12-05T08:47:06.020-08:002018-12-05T08:47:06.020-08:00 F m total
N 9 10 19
H... F m total<br />N 9 10 19<br />Height total total total <br />Weight t total total<br />Swethahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07924729684926616338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-35410998323354897102017-05-01T05:40:02.479-07:002017-05-01T05:40:02.479-07:00hi
Nice post!!!
Just a quick feedback.. for the ...hi<br /><br />Nice post!!!<br /><br />Just a quick feedback.. for the below question<br /><br />Q28. The SAS data sets WORK.EMPLOYEE and WORK.SALARY are listed below:<br /><br />WORK.EMPLOYEE<br />fname age<br />Bruce 30<br />Dan 40<br />Dan 25000<br /><br />WORK.SALARY<br />fname salary<br />Bruce 25000<br />Bruce 35000<br /><br />I think that the last observation from WORK.EMPLOYEE should be moved to WORK.SALARY.<br /><br />Thanks again... Keep up the good work.nileshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11892270787430506113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-70913437225852850672016-11-02T11:10:04.438-07:002016-11-02T11:10:04.438-07:00Very nice starting.Very nice starting.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11301100950368210092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-28961205297781916422016-09-18T11:03:49.416-07:002016-09-18T11:03:49.416-07:00very nice work brother...helped me a lot. thank yo...very nice work brother...helped me a lot. thank you<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-23312917278648925672015-11-19T17:34:16.670-08:002015-11-19T17:34:16.670-08:00First I would like to mention the questionnaire ha...First I would like to mention the questionnaire has been prepared in a good manner and the answers have been explained well.<br /><br />On question 24 you have missed the options. Please add them. Thanks Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7958828565254404797.post-81844099934824925832015-04-01T21:30:53.937-07:002015-04-01T21:30:53.937-07:00On Question 26, where the program is trying to mer...On Question 26, where the program is trying to merge two datasets that have been sorted by 'descending fname', the answers cover possibilities assuming that the merge WILL fail, but in fact whether or not it fails is data-dependent, and the merge MAY work.<br /><br />If the work.employee dataset, regardless of how many records it has, has only a single value for fname (e.g., 'Roberto'), and the work.salary dataset, regardless of how many records it has, has only a single value for fname (e.g., 'Lei-Lei'), then sort order Descending equals sort order Ascending and the merge works without an error, from a syntactic point of view. (I'd argue that many-to-many merges in SAS are almost always logically incorrect, but that's not the question here.)<br /><br />If each dataset has zero or one record, the merge will ALWAYS work without producing any error messages. <br /><br />Doug Dame<br />Imagine Health<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com