**Significance Testing : Meaning**

You have a sample data and you are asked to assess the credibility of a statement about population.

**Statistical significance**evaluates the likelihood that an observed difference is due to chance.

It deals with the following question :

If we selected many samples from the same population, would we still find the same relationship between these two variables in every sample? Or is our finding due only to random chance?

**Independent T-Test**

The independent t test evaluates whether the means for two independent groups are significantly different from each other. It is used for just 2 groups of samples. If you have more than 2 groups of samples, you should use ANOVA.

**Assumptions**

- Each score is sampled independently and randomly.
- The scores are normally distributed within each of the two groups.
- The variance in each of the groups is equal.

**Case Study**

How powerful are rumors? Frequently, students ask friends and/or look at instructor evaluations to decide if a class is worth taking. Kelley (1950) found that instructor reputation has a profound impact on actual teaching ratings.

*[Source : Journal of Personality, 18, 431-439]*

**Experimental Design**

Before viewing the lecture, students were given a summary of the instructors prior teaching evaluations.

**There were two types of instructors : Charismatic instructor and Punitive instructor.****Null Hypothesis**

It is a statement that you want to test. It usually states that there is no relationship between the two variables.

In this case, the null hypothesis states that

**there is no difference between the mean ratings of the charismatic-teacher-reputation condition and the punitive-teacher-reputation condition.****Alternate Hypothesis**

It is contrary to the null hypothesis. It usually states that there is a relationship between the two variables.

In this case, the alternate hypothesis states that

**there is a difference between the mean ratings of the charismatic-teacher-reputation condition and the punitive-teacher-reputation condition.**

**Type I and II Errors**

Hypothesis Testing : Type I and II Errors |

**Interpretation**

*An independent-samples t-test was used to test the difference between the mean ratings of the charismatic-teacher-reputation condition and the punitive-teacher-reputation condition. The output from SPSS is shown below*

*Assumption Check*The columns labeled "" tell us whether an assumption of the t-test has been met. The t-test assumes that the variance in each of the groups is approximately equal.Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

Look at the column labeled "Sig." under the heading "Levene's Test for Equality of Variances". In this example, the significance (p value) of Levene's test is .880. If this value is less than or equal to 5% level of significance (.05), then you can reject the null hypothesis that the variability of the two groups is equal, implying that the variances are unequal.

If the significance (p value) of Levene's test is less than or equal to 5% level of significance (.05), then you should use the bottom row of the output (the row labeled)"Equal variances not assumed"

If the significance (p value) of Levene's test is greater than 5% level of significance (.05), then you should use the middle row of the output (the row labeled)"Equal variances assumed"

In this example, .880 is larger than 0.05, so we will assume that the variances are equal and we will use the middle row of the output.

**Conclusion**

The column labeled "Sig. (2-tailed)" gives the two-tailed p value associated with the test. In this example, the p value is .018.

Since p-value .018 is less than .05, so we reject null hypothesis. That implies that there is a significant difference between the mean ratings of the charismatic-teacher-reputation condition and the punitive-teacher-reputation condition.

Hi Deepanshu,

ReplyDeleteI like your blog & i follow it regularly. Your explanation is crystal clear. I learned many things from your blog. Please try to post below requests;

1) statistical modeling using SAS & R

2) how to fit model using SAS & R

3) fitting the model with SAS & R

4) Normal Distribution

5) Correlation

6) Linear Regression

7) Multiple Regression

8) ANOVA

9) Categorical Data Analysis

Many thanks & Kind Regards,

Naveen

Sure. I will write about these topics!

DeleteDeep, Thanks a lot.

Deletehi this is kartik,

ReplyDeletehow do we know which teacher is better..??

Look at the mean difference of ratings of the charismatic-teacher-reputation condition and the punitive-teacher-reputation. Since difference is positive, it means charismatic-teacher is better.

DeleteHi Bhalla, pls I want to know how to interpret Cluster Analysis and PCA. I have some data i want interpret. I love the clarity of your explanations. If you don't mind you can send it to my email:michaelokiotor@gmail.com

ReplyDeleteThanks

I'm a reearch student.

ReplyDeleteThanks

Deepanshu, Your blog is awesome bro! Thanks for sharing.. Keep up the good work

ReplyDeletewhen we talk of two groups on t-test is it between two regression models or two columns, can we say f-Test is a method to compare models

ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.

ReplyDeleteThis is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. Trentostan-m

ReplyDeletesir, 1.if our variance of two groups are not equal then what will we do?

ReplyDelete2. If our null hypothesis is reject that is our p value is less than 0.05 then how can we find which one is grater in charismatic-teacher-reputation condition and the punitive-teacher-reputation condition.